Blog

Unipolar versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Hip Replacement: What You Need to Know

Unipolar versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Hip Replacement: What You Need to Know

Hip fractures are a serious concern, especially among older adults. When someone breaks their hip, surgery is often necessary to relieve pain and restore mobility. One common surgical option is hemiarthroplasty, a procedure that replaces only part of the hip joint . In this article, we’ll explain what hemiarthroplasty is, the differences between unipolar and bipolar implants, what happens during and after surgery, and what recovery looks like.


What Is Hemiarthroplasty and Why Is It Used?

Hemiarthroplasty is a form of hip replacement in which only the ball at the top of the thigh bone (femoral head) is replaced. The socket in the pelvis (acetabulum) remains intact. This surgery is typically recommended for older patients, often those aged 80 or above, who have fractured their hip. Compared to a total hip replacement —which replaces both the ball and socket—hemiarthroplasty is less invasive, usually involves a shorter surgery, and allows for a quicker recovery.

Thanks to advances in implant design and materials, hemiarthroplasty is a dependable option. It helps relieve pain and restore movement , making it a good solution for patients who may not be able to undergo more extensive surgery. Research has shown positive outcomes, with most patients experiencing preserved joint function and pain relief .


Unipolar and Bipolar Implants: What’s the Difference?

The key distinction between unipolar and bipolar implants lies in how they interact with the body’s own joint structures.

  • Unipolar implants have a single moving part: the new artificial ball replaces the femoral head and moves directly against the natural socket.
  • Bipolar implants contain two moving parts. The artificial ball fits into an outer shell, which then moves against the socket. This design provides extra movement within the implant itself.

Why does this matter? The added mobility of a bipolar implant may reduce wear on the natural socket, potentially resulting in less pain and smoother motion over time. Some research supports this idea, suggesting that bipolar implants may distribute pressure more evenly and help maintain healthier joint cartilage for longer.

However, large studies have not shown major differences in complication rates between the two types—specifically, when it comes to dislocation and stability. For most patients, the choice of implant depends on factors like their age, bone health, daily activity level, and the nature of the fracture.


Surgery and Possible Complications

Deciding between a unipolar and bipolar implant isn’t just about the mechanics. Surgeons weigh many factors, including a patient’s age, overall health, bone quality, and the type of fracture .

As with any surgery, hemiarthroplasty carries certain risks. One potential complication is dislocation—when the artificial joint slips out of place. Research has found that the overall dislocation rate for hemiarthroplasty is about 3.4%. The risk is slightly higher with certain surgical approaches or techniques, such as a posterior approach or with cemented implants. To help prevent a dislocation , patients often follow specific movement precautions after surgery.

Other possible complications include fractures around the implant, infection , or, in rare cases, fat embolism (when fat enters the bloodstream during surgery). In some situations—such as ongoing pain or loosening of the joint—it may be necessary to convert a hemiarthroplasty to a total hip replacement later on.

Awareness of these risks helps patients and caregivers know what to watch for during recovery and gives them greater peace of mind.


Recovery: What Happens Week by Week?

Recovery after hemiarthroplasty usually begins soon after surgery. Most patients are encouraged to start moving and walking—with help—within a day or two, usually with the support of a physiotherapist. Early movement lowers the risk of blood clots and speeds up healing.

By about four weeks, many people can handle basic activities like walking short distances and getting dressed. Some evidence suggests that bipolar implants might allow for a slightly easier recovery because of the implant’s added mobility, but every patient’s journey is unique. It’s also worth noting that, while rare, bipolar implants can sometimes require further treatment if a dislocation occurs .

At 12 weeks, most patients enjoy improved mobility and strength. However, full recovery may take longer, particularly for those who have other health challenges. The NHS and other sources recommend gradually increasing activity levels and weight-bearing as tolerated, always guided by a healthcare professional.

Clear advice on what recovery should look like—week by week—can make a huge difference. It gives patients confidence and motivation to stick with their rehabilitation plan , helping them get back to everyday life as safely and quickly as possible.


Final Thoughts

Both unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty implants play important roles in helping older adults recover from hip fractures . Unipolar implants are generally simpler and less expensive, while bipolar implants may offer added movement that can benefit some patients. The best choice depends on individual needs, including age, bone quality, and lifestyle.

No matter which implant is chosen, recovery is a gradual process that demands patience, support, and a good rehabilitation strategy. As technology and surgical techniques continue to improve, so do the outcomes for patients.

Understanding the basics of unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty can help patients and their families make informed decisions and approach recovery with greater clarity and optimism.

References

Lawler, E. A., Kuhl, T., & Adams, B. D. (2016). Distal Radius Hemiarthroplasty. Journal of Wrist Surgery, 5(03), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1572509

Roffman, M., & du Toit, G. T. (1985). Osteochondral hemiarthroplasty. International Orthopaedics, 9(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00267041

Varley, J., & Parker, M. J. (2004). Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties. International Orthopaedics, 28(5), 274-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0572-z

Legal & Medical Disclaimer

This article is written by an independent contributor and reflects their own views and experience, not necessarily those of Lincolnshire Hip Clinic. It is provided for general information and education only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Always seek personalised advice from a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health. Lincolnshire Hip Clinic accepts no responsibility for errors, omissions, third-party content, or any loss, damage, or injury arising from reliance on this material.

If you believe this article contains inaccurate or infringing content, please contact us at [email protected].

Last reviewed: 2026For urgent medical concerns, contact your local emergency services.
Stay Updated

Latest from us

Modern Non-Surgical Alternatives to Hip Replacement
30 Jan 2026John Davies

Modern Non-Surgical Alternatives to Hip Replacement

Hip pain and joint degeneration often lead to considering hip replacement surgery, a common yet invasive procedure with risks and long recovery. Modern alternatives, including physiotherapy, medications, minimally invasive surgeries, and regenerative treatments like stem cell therapy, offer effective options for managing symptoms and improving mobility without full replacement. Personalized care from multidisciplinary experts ensures tailored treatment plans. Staying informed with evolving therapies helps patients make safer, evidence-based decisions to maintain an active lifestyle. Consult healthcare professionals for guidance on the best approach to hip health.

Redefining Relief: Moving Beyond Short-Term Viscosupplementation to Lasting Knee OA Solutions
28 Jan 2026John Davies

Redefining Relief: Moving Beyond Short-Term Viscosupplementation to Lasting Knee OA Solutions

This article compares hyaluronic acid (HA) injections and Arthrosamid hydrogel treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). While HA injections provide temporary relief by improving joint lubrication, their effects are short-lived and require multiple sessions. Arthrosamid offers a longer-lasting, single-injection option by integrating with the joint lining to cushion and support the knee. Studies indicate Arthrosamid is safe and especially beneficial for older, non-diabetic patients with mild OA, promoting improved knee function and symptom relief over 24 months. Personalized treatment plans remain essential, as patient needs and responses vary. Ongoing research and clinical expertise aim to optimize patient outcomes and advance OA management beyond transient symptom relief.

Navigating the Total Hip Replacement Journey: A Week-by-Week Guide to Recovery and Everyday Comfort in the UK
28 Jan 2026John Davies

Navigating the Total Hip Replacement Journey: A Week-by-Week Guide to Recovery and Everyday Comfort in the UK

This comprehensive UK-focused guide outlines the week-by-week recovery process following total hip replacement surgery, emphasizing expert advice from Professor Paul Lee and the MSK Doctors team. It covers pain management, early mobility, exercise recommendations, and lifestyle adjustments from the first week through 12 weeks and beyond. Highlighting advances in surgical techniques and enhanced recovery pathways, the article addresses common patient concerns such as safe movement, use of walking aids, and returning to daily activities. It underscores the importance of professional support, clear communication, and personalized care to achieve optimal outcomes. Additionally, the guide notes the impact of healthcare resource limitations on recovery timelines, advocating ongoing patient education and tailored rehabilitation strategies for sustained joint health.